Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0731684405050402v1
24/15/1611    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Friction, Geometry, and Fixture Compliance on the Perceived Toughness from Three-and Four-Point Bend End-Notched Flexure Tests

Barry D. Davidson

Xuekun Sun

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Manufacturing Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA

Linear and nonlinear finite element analyses are used to examine the effects of friction, test geometry, and fixture compliance on the perceived toughness as obtained from threeand four-point bend end-notched flexure tests. To this end, a newly developed ‘direct energy balance approach’ is used to obtain the ‘true’ energy release rate for any given specimen, test geometry, and coefficient of friction. Finite element analyses are also used in a simulated compliance calibration technique, which is combined with experimental results from fixture compliance tests to obtain a perceived toughness, i.e., the value that would be obtained by experiment. By varying the different parameters, the individual and combined effects of friction, test geometry, and fixture compliance on the ratio of the perceived to true toughness is obtained. The approach is applied to two graphite/epoxy materials for which toughnesses by the three(3ENF) and four-point bend end-notched flexure (4ENF) tests are obtained experimentally for a range of geometries. These experiments produced larger perceived mode II toughnesses, GIIc, by the 4ENF than the 3ENF test, and GIIc values from the 4ENF test were observed to decrease with increasing outer span length. The finite element simulations were shown to accurately recreate the perceived values of GIIc obtained from these tests. Moreover, the finite element simulations indicate that the true toughness values are essentially constant for a given material. These findings are used to make some general recommendations for choosing 3ENF and 4ENF specimen and test geometries, as well as to discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of the 3ENF and 4ENF test methods.

Key Words: delamination • mode II • nonlinear • finite element • energy balance • energy release rate

This version was published on October 1, 2005

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 24, No. 15, 1611-1628 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0731684405050402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?