Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Latour, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Analysis of Composite Structures Using the 3-D Global/3-D Local Method

S. Srinivasan

Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634

S. B. BIGGERS, Jr.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634

R. A. Latour, Jr.

Department of Bioengineering and, Materials Science & Engineering Program, Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634

A global/local (G/L) method is presented for the analysis of composite structures that need to be modeled in 3-D. The method employs a modified version of effective stiffnesses specification at the global level such that both extensional and flexural behavior of symmetric composite structures are replicated. A numerical verification problem of a quasi-isotropic composite cantilever beam with mid-beam cut-outs under edge pressure load is used to determine the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed 3-D Global/3-D Local method. The effect of global stiffness specification on the local solution is explored. Results indicate that the proposed G/L method may be over 20 times more efficient while the error in both in-plane and interlaminar stresses are less than 5% when compared to the predictions of a highly refined finite element model used as a control.

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 16, No. 4, 353-371 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/073168449701600406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?